Head to head
Landingfolio vs Dribbble
Landingfolio and Dribbble solve the same job (Inspiration & reference), so this is a pick-one decision. Landingfolio is our default here: Best value on the whole list at $59 lifetime. Rare case where the answer is real code, not prompt fuel: grab the Tailwind version, paste into Lovable, then ask it to refactor into shadcn primitives. Ships an MCP server at 1,000 requests/day so Claude can pull components directly.
Quick read
- Free with no card: Dribbble.
- Editor's pick: Landingfolio.
| Field | Landingfoliolandingfolio.com Not yet swept | Dribbbledribbble.com Not yet swept |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Two products: a gallery of shipped landing pages filterable by industry and color, and a component library shipping actual code in Tailwind, React, Vue, HTML, Figma and Webflow — extracted from real pages rather than invented. | Social portfolio network of static UI 'shots'. Images only — no files, no code, no Figma sources unless a designer chooses to link one. Much of what trends is unbuilt concept work. |
| Category | Inspiration & reference | Inspiration & reference |
| Cost tier | mixed | free |
| Pricing | Free tier · $59 lifetime | Free · Pro $48–$1,188/yr |
| Why builders pick it | Best value on the whole list at $59 lifetime. Rare case where the answer is real code, not prompt fuel: grab the Tailwind version, paste into Lovable, then ask it to refactor into shadcn primitives. Ships an MCP server at 1,000 requests/day so Claude can pull components directly. | Two real uses: the color search (filter the entire gallery by a hex value, useful when a brand color is fixed), and vocabulary — shot titles teach you the terms ('bento grid', 'editorial hero') that make Lovable prompts land. Treat the polish as aspirational. |
| Watch out for | not logged | not logged |
| How to wire it up | not logged | not logged |
| Editor's pick | Yes | No |
Other matchups worth running
Agent endpoint: GET /api/public/compare?slugs=dribbble,landingfolio